Discussion: View Thread

JIBS call for papers: Internationalization in the Information Age

  • 1.  JIBS call for papers: Internationalization in the Information Age

    Posted 04-03-2013 16:59
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Special Issue of the Journal of International Business Studies

    INTERNATIONALIZATION IN THE INFORMATION AGE


    Special Issue Editors
    • Juan Alcacer (Harvard Business School, USA, jalcacer@hbs.edu)
    • John Cantwell (Rutgers Business School, USA, cantwell@jibs.net)
    • Giovanni Dosi (Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Italy,
    gdosi@sssup.it)
    • Sergio Mariotti (Politecnico di Milano, Italy, sergio.mariotti@polimi.it)
    • Lucia Piscitello (Politecnico di Milano, Italy,
    lucia.piscitello@polimi.it)

    Deadline for submission: December 31, 2013

    Tentative publication date: Spring 2015

    Introduction
    With the emergence of what many scholars call an information and
    communication age, the associated changes in the character of international
    business (IB) activity have been profound, as illustrated by the discussion
    over the idea that the world has become flat. However, the debate about the
    relative importance of various drivers behind what has sometimes been called
    the third industrial revolution has been lively yet remains inconclusive.
    Some of the features that have been suggested as characterizing the new age
    include the following: organizational decentralization, vertical
    disintegration and specialization, modularity, flexibility, accelerated
    knowledge creation, exchange or diffusion, and increased knowledge
    complexity, inter-organizational collaboration and openness, and various
    kinds of networks. Institution settings have also changed alongside the new
    wave of technological innovation, leading to changes across countries in the
    mechanisms responsible for standardization, intellectual property rights,
    and the institutional conditions fostering individual and local creativity
    but which have also been associated with new regulatory and industrial
    policies, trade policies, privatization and liberalization. Many of these
    changes have facilitated the internationalization of firms.

    In this context, business activity from production to knowledge creation has
    come to rely on internationally highly disaggregated and geographically
    dispersed value chains; and yet a continued centralization of certain
    functions (including R&D, marketing and finance), as well as control over
    subsidiary management and decision making. At the same time this has left
    the way for corporate disaggregation, and more decentralized organizational
    forms in which resources, including technology and managerial talent, might
    be distributed among subsidiaries and integrated between them through strong
    interdependencies. Thus, the traditional model of the MNE as a simple
    hierarchy and related conceptual approaches are in danger of becoming
    anachronistic and progressively less appropriate in capturing new trends and
    opportunities made feasible by the new technological paradigm, which has
    triggered or required new forms and processes for the international
    organization of production. Flexibility, knowledge creation, collaboration
    and international connections, as well as the characteristics of the
    institutional contexts in which these expanded interorganizational relations
    are embedded have become essential elements to be considered for the
    contemporary MNE. A finer slicing of the value chain is associated with
    networked forms that have shifted the boundaries of the firm. So the
    contemporary MNE is defined by the orchestration of international networks
    rather than merely by the international ownership of assets.

    This topic can usefully be addressed from the standpoint of several extant
    streams of international business (IB) research and, in turn, it suggests
    the need to develop the theory of the MNE and international production in
    various new directions. The purpose of this Special Issue is to suggest how
    established IB approaches can be positively adapted, revised or extended to
    allow for the restructuring of MNEs and the new organizational forms of
    internationalization which have arisen to better explore and exploit the
    trajectories of the Information and Communication technological paradigm.
    For example, the O (Ownership) advantages of Dunning’s eclectic paradigm now
    consist of capabilities that are dispersed among actors which are part of a
    common network, and a primary O advantage of the MNE becomes its ability to
    foster innovative connections between specialized capabilities across
    countries and organizations; the L (Location) dimension should allow that
    location-bound characteristics alone cannot fully explain firms’ locational
    strategies, and that firm-location developmental interactions must be taken
    into account more fully; while the I (Internalization) dimension might be
    adapted to allow for the spread of more open and informal
    interorganizational relationships and networks.

    Topics
    In particular, we aim to encourage a multidisciplinary understanding of
    these issues by integrating IB more closely with research in progress in
    organization studies, and approaches from economic sociology, international
    economics, strategy, management and others. The objective of the special
    issue is to develop a finer-grained analysis of how the nature, boundaries
    and organizational forms of the MNE have adapted to more recent
    technological and institutional changes. We hope that this collection of
    papers will contribute to the ongoing yet still inconclusive dialogue among
    scholars in these disciplines, with the aim of constructing a more unified
    body of theory and a common epistemology for thinking about the continuing
    processes of transformation of IB activity. Hence, we welcome both
    theoretical and empirical contributions, and papers adopting either a single
    or multi-level analysis. Illustrative topics may include:

    • The traditional paradigm of the MNE as a simple hierarchy had been already
    questioned in the 1980s and complemented by the notion of a globally
    networked transnational corporation in response to environmental forces and
    simultaneous demands for global efficiency, national responsiveness, and
    worldwide learning. Extending this line of reasoning, what further
    restructuring of international corporations, and new organizational
    processes and practices in firms’ internationalization, would be more
    appropriate to exploring and exploiting the trajectories of the Information
    and Communication (IC) paradigm?
    • The international fragmentation of production systems and the geographical
    dispersion of the value chain have opened up new scenarios and opportunities
    for new actors. How has the relative relevance of location factors and
    geographical hierarchies changed? How are emerging market countries
    capturing these opportunities to catch up and to shift their role in global
    supply/value chains? How do recent processes of backsourcing/backshoring
    reflect the same changes (i.e. are they the other side of the same coin)?
    • Increasing de-verticalization and modularity of products and processes
    foster complex and dispersed network organizations. How do firms manage
    multifaceted portfolios including various forms of corporate partnering,
    external collaboration and non-equity forms across borders? What governance
    structures have been adopted to manage cross-country interorganizational
    networks? What creative value chain orchestration approaches are needed in
    this landscape? And what are the characteristics of a wider range of
    inter-organizational ties? Does the initiative for network formation come
    still at the firm level, or are more disaggregated levels of analysis
    needed? Are cross-boundary and cross-functional teams as well as flexible
    project-based forms of organizations more appropriate forms?
    • How do changes in the international economic, technological, and social
    environment create new opportunities and roles for SMEs, international new
    ventures, international entrepreneurship and global start-ups? Conversely,
    what is the evolution in the role of large global companies when they
    metamorphose from being primary producers and distributors to becoming
    aggregators? Have they successfully developed a new capacity to act as
    knowledge and capability coordinators or integrators?
    • Technological revolutions and the evolution of industrial structures: How
    do information and communication as well as new digital technologies change
    sectoral boundaries (e.g. between manufacturing and non-manufacturing
    industries), deconstruct traditional industries, and stimulate the emergence
    of new sectors? Are reallocation and recombination of innovative efforts
    among international intra-firm and external actors facilitated by these new
    general purpose technologies? How do changes in sectoral boundaries impact
    corporate diversification and stimulate new organizational forms to manage
    geographical dispersion?
    • Organizations evolve and adapt to their technological and institutional
    environments, and these changes are not unidirectional. What are the
    conditions enabling the harmonious co-evolution of MNE international
    networks with their institutional environment and policy context? What is
    the role of country-specific institutional systems? Do changes in the
    relationship between the public and private spheres, such as public private
    partnerships, play different roles in different industries and countries?
    • How, and to what extent, does the emergence of new manufacturing
    technologies (e.g. digital manufacturing - additive manufacturing,
    continuous manufacturing, collective manufacturing, crowdsourcing, cloud
    computing and cloud manufacturing) lead to the international reorganization
    of production networks? How, and to what extent, do information technologies
    and increasing flexibility impact upon labor market and employment practices
    (e.g. freelance labor and project based work when internationally managed or
    coordinated)?

    Submission Process
    All manuscripts will be reviewed as a cohort for this special issue.
    Manuscripts must be submitted in the window between December 17, 2013, and
    December 31, 2013, at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jibs. All submissions
    will go through the JIBS regular double-blind review process and follow the
    standard norms and processes.

    For more information about this call for papers, please contact the Special
    Issue Editors or the JIBS Managing Editor (managing-editor@jibs.net).

    For a list of references cited in this call and information about the Guest
    Editors, please see the full call for papers available at
    http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/Internationalization_SI_Call_for_Paper
    s.html.



    -------------------
    Anne Hoekman
    Managing Editor, Journal of International Business Studies
     
    JIBS Editorial Office
    Academy of International Business
    Michigan State University
    Tel: +1-517-481-3518
    Fax: +1-517-432-1009
    Email: managing-editor@jibs.net
    Web: www.jibs.net
     
    Want to stay up-to-date on JIBS? Follow @JIBSupdates on Twitter!