Discussion: View Thread

IMD-L Digest - 2 Aug 2014 to 6 Aug 2014 (#2014-155)

  • 1.  IMD-L Digest - 2 Aug 2014 to 6 Aug 2014 (#2014-155)

    Posted 08-07-2014 03:51
    Hi Alfredo,

    Like you have an interesting analogy of a fish-bone, there is another analogy of a 'networked' organization that seems to come close to your description.

    I wonder what relationship is shared by the 'spine' and the 'bones' -- do they retain their identities? Do they entertain other clients/projects? Do the 'bones' have 'sub-bones'? In some ways, the 'network' metaphor removes the 'serial' or 'one way' nature of interactions and adds mutuality to their relationships and relative power.

    Check a few diagrams on Google Images:
     
     
    Also, if these collaborators are not together formally into one organization, then they are also a virtual organization connected in a network, which also suggests that there is a 'nucleus' and then there are particles surrounding it. The binding force would be common (though perhaps short-lived) interests and trust. Fred Luthans describes these organizations quite well in his text Organizational Behavior.

    For starters, you might like to see this paper by Manju Ahuja and K. Carley here:

    I hope it helps.
    Best,
    margie



    Margie Parikh, PhD
    B K School of Business Management
    Gujarat University, University Road, Ahmedabad - 380 009, India
    Tel: (O) +917926304811


    On Thursday, 7 August 2014 9:33 AM, IMD-L automatic digest system <LISTSERV@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU> wrote:


    ----- Forwarded Message -----

     

    IMD-L Digest - 2 Aug 2014 to 6 Aug 2014 (#2014-155)

    Table of contents:

    1. Organizational structure

    This is my first incursion into a field I know so little about that I must beg your pardon for my fuzziness.

    I need info on literature to get me started on figuring out what is the name of the structure like that of  automotive companies and others who rely on a constellation of associated but independent companies which produce car parts according to design and suitability. The associate companies need not be close, as we have learned from the expansion of international outsourcing

    Operation system developers like Microsoft, Google and Apple must hold close links to application developers as well as chip manufacturers to ensure that tehre will be demand for their, say, smartphones.

    It is as if we had some sort of fishbone design with organizations like GM, Apple and others at the head, followed by an arrange of spines representing the inputs of associated companieas which are aligned with the overarching purpose of helping GM. Apple and others to sell, so as to insure their own growth.

    Alternative structures? Name of the field? Seminal articles to start with?
     
    Many thanks
     
    Alfredo
    Land line +551138280554
    mobile: +5511991339779





    Hi Alfredo,
    In marketing we call them Vertical Marketing Systems. There are generally three types: corporate, contractual, or administered. See  http://smallbusiness.chron.com/three-types-vertical-marketing-systems-64258.html
    Best
    Kerk

    Kerk Burbank, Ph.D.
    Professor
    Department of Business and Management Studies
    St. George's University
    PO Box 75, True Blue
    St. George's Grenada
    Ext. (473)444-4175 (473)444-4175 , ext. 3753
    U.S. Cell: (215) 704-1694 (215) 704-1694
    Grenada Cell: (473) 459-2290 (473) 459-2290


    -----International Management Discussion List <IMD-L@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU> wrote: -----
    To: IMD-L@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
    From: Alfredo Behrens
    Sent by: International Management Discussion List
    Date: 08/06/2014 12:03PM
    Subject: Organizational structure

    This is my first incursion into a field I know so little about that I must beg your pardon for my fuzziness.

    I need info on literature to get me started on figuring out what is the name of the structure like that of automotive companies and others who rely on a constellation of associated but independent companies which produce car parts according to design and suitability. The associate companies need not be close, as we have learned from the expansion of international outsourcing

    Operation system developers like Microsoft, Google and Apple must hold close links to application developers as well as chip manufacturers to ensure that tehre will be demand for their, say, smartphones.

    It is as if we had some sort of fishbone design with organizations like GM, Apple and others at the head, followed by an arrange of spines representing the inputs of associated companieas which are aligned with the overarching purpose of helping GM. Apple and others to sell, so as to insure their own growth.

    Alternative structures? Name of the field? Seminal articles to start with?
     
    Many thanks
     
    Alfredo
    Land line +551138280554 +551138280554
    mobile: +5511991339779 +5511991339779






    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
    For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
    ______________________________________________________________________
    You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype
    =================================================
    This e-mail is intended to be a private and confidential communication.
    This message (and any attachments) contains information that is confidential and privileged and protected from disclosure. It is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or any parts of it, please immediately contact the sender and delete the message from your system. No other person is authorized to copy, forward or disclose, distribute or retain this message in any form. The sender shall not be liable for the incomplete transmission of this message nor for any delay in its receipt and does not guarantee that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference.

    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
    For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
    ______________________________________________________________________
     Some terms used are: Suppliers. Supplier network.  Supply Chain. Supplier systems. Vendor network. Alliances. Logistics.  
    Partners (even when they are not legally partners). More narrowly for internal use: Captive suppliers and Independent suppliers.

    ----------- 
    On Aug 6, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Alfredo Behrens <alfredobehrens@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
    This is my first incursion into a field I know so little about that I must beg your pardon for my fuzziness.
    I need info on literature to get me started on figuring out what is the name of the structure like that of  automotive companies and others who rely on a constellation of associated but independent companies which produce car parts according to design and suitability. The associate companies need not be close, as we have learned from the expansion of international outsourcing
    Operation system developers like Microsoft, Google and Apple must hold close links to application developers as well as chip manufacturers to ensure that tehre will be demand for their, say, smartphones.
    It is as if we had some sort of fishbone design with organizations like GM, Apple and others at the head, followed by an arrange of spines representing the inputs of associated companieas which are aligned with the overarching purpose of helping GM. Apple and others to sell, so as to insure their own growth.
    Alternative structures? Name of the field? Seminal articles to start with?
     
    Many thanks
     
    Alfredo


    Land line +551138280554
    mobile: +5511991339779