Discussion: View Thread

Call for Papers: MOR Special Issue - "Coopetition and Innovation in Transforming Economies" -deadline: April 30, 2017

  • 1.  Call for Papers: MOR Special Issue - "Coopetition and Innovation in Transforming Economies" -deadline: April 30, 2017

    Posted 01-17-2017 18:28
    CALL FOR PAPERS FOR A SPECIAL ISSUE

    Management and Organization Review

    "COOPETITION AND INNOVATION IN TRANSFORMING ECONOMIES"

    SUBMISSION DEADLINE: April 30, 2017

    Web site:
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/news/call-for-papers-management-and-organization-review-special-issue

    Guest Editors:

    Jay B. Barney
    University of Utah

    Giovanni Battista Dagnino
    University of Catania

    Valentina Della Corte
    University of Naples ?Federico II?

    Eric W.K. Tsang
    University of Texas Dallas

    Special Issue Theme Background
    This Management and Organization Research (MOR) special issue on
    "Coopetition and Innovation in Transforming Economies" aims to look at
    the key features of strategic relationship between coopetition and
    innovation in transforming economies. It is quite straightforward that
    in many transforming economies innovation can be a fundamental driver
    for economic growth, new employment, dwindling economic disparity, and
    boosting wellbeing. Actually, today the booming of factual phenomena
    tied to innovation shows that it is rapidly evolving both in contents,
    processes and directions: it is no more a factor that takes place
    inside the firm but is often bound to the overall set of relationships
    a firm has. Therefore, inter-firm collaboration and relational
    theories can add value to the research on the process. On the other
    hands, recent studies show that competition often fosters innovation
    and some competitive dynamics add value to firms? strategies. The two
    phenomena: competition and cooperation interact continuously, thus
    creating new opportunities, favoring innovation and stimulating change
    (Ansari, Garud and Kumaraswami, in press). This condition occurs in
    emerging markets with a specific role played by national cultures and
    philosophical inspiration (e.g., Taoism, Confucianism, Hinduism, and
    Buddhism) that make the way for acceptance of the coopetitive mindset
    (Dagnino, Di Guardo and Padula, 2012), fruitful differences between
    countries and regional ecologies, as well as for the necessity of fast
    growing economies to rely on a mix of coopetition and innovation
    spirit so as to accelerate (or keep) the pace of growth and development.

    We are aware that the need for forging an interactive approach to
    coopetition and innovation has attracted the collective imagery and
    the joint attention of researchers, executives, and consultants in
    both transforming and established economies. New journals have been
    created, new series of workshops, conferences, and seminars have been
    launched, and novel communities of academics and/or practitioners have
    been inaugurated and progressively solidified. However, it clearly
    appears that the key topics (coopetition and innovation), even if
    growingly developed in recent years, have not been properly treated in
    their reciprocal interconnections. This condition does not come as a
    surprise. Interestingly, the two management sub-fields have rather
    different origins: while coopetition finds its roots in the study of
    competitive and cooperative interaction and game-theoretic strategic
    interdependence pioneered by Brandenburger and Nalebuff (1996) and the
    yin-yan approach (Chen, 2008; Hong and Snell, 2015), the study of
    innovation originates from Schumpeterian and industrial organization
    economics inquiry on the impact of the waves of technological change
    on industry and market structures (Kelly and Kranzburg, 1978; Dosi,
    1982). We believe that researching coopetition and innovation
    together, instead of doing it separately, would significantly enhance
    our understanding of the phenomenon.

    Since limited efforts have been heretofore advanced to bring together
    the two research streams in a systematic way and transforming
    economies provide the ?natural laboratory? and ?ideal setting? to
    study their interfaces (Liu, Luo, Yang and Maksimov, 2014), this MOR
    special issue proposes to explore the relationships between
    coopetition and innovation by thoroughly detecting and delving into
    their relevant interfaces in transforming economies. We have adequate
    evidence to believe that fast changing transforming economies outgrow
    plenty of opportunities for spurring boundary-crossing dialog and
    discourse on the intersection of the key areas of coopetition and
    innovation.

    In this view, coopetition is considered in a dual perspective:
    (1) it is a setting within which to analyze innovation; and
    (2) it is a specific strategy (coopetitive strategy ? Dagnino and
    Rocco, 2009) that may turn into a source of innovation (Cassiman, Di
    Guardo and Valentini, 2009; Gnyawali and Park, 2011; Ritala and
    Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2013) and, therefore, of value creation and
    competitive advantage for firms, industries, and the whole society.
    For the reasons above, the MOR special issue seeks to gather an array
    of empirical and theoretical contributions that significantly add to
    our understanding of the multiple potential connections between
    coopetition and innovation in transforming economies.

    Since the assembly of a strong set of papers that thoroughly examine
    the interplay between coopetition and innovation will help reveal
    emerging markets? significant societal changes driven by the outspread
    of coopetitive interactions and dynamics, the special issue is highly
    relevant to the understanding of multiple evolutionary facets of
    transforming economies. Actually, coopetitive interactions are more
    complex connections vis-à-vis traditional sheer competitive and
    cooperative relationships that require dedicated inquiry (Bengtsson
    and Kock, 2014), especially when they knit with innovation. On the
    ground of experiences observed in the setting of transforming
    economies, the MOR special issue will also attempt to lay the
    groundwork to envision and design an array of coopetition techniques
    and tools that potentially inform the world of management practice in
    the next decade.

    Research Questions
    Here follows a list of research questions, intended to be neither
    exhaustive nor complete, in the context of transforming economies that
    we propose to the academic and managerial community in strategy and
    innovation management:
    ? Why do firms decide to ?coopete??
    ? How do coopetitive settings foster innovation processes?
    ? How do technological forces drive the process of coopetition?
    ? What are the implications of coopetitive settings on technological
    advancement and adoption of technological standards?
    ? How can firms protect their propriety technologies while innovating
    in coopetitive settings?
    ? How can firms benefit from the pursuit of coopetition strategies?
    ? Do coopetition strategies involve both large firms as well as small
    and medium enterprises?
    ? What insights can the cultural perspective offer to the
    investigation of the interplay between coopetition and innovation?
    ? Does coopetition stimulate innovation and the rise of new? Why and how?
    ? Does innovation foster coopetitive dynamics? If yes, how?
    ? Does coopetition favor the creation of new markets or the
    transformation of existing markets?
    ? Is coopetition more fit to knowledge-based firms? Why?
    ? What is the role of coopetition within, between, and among
    entrepreneurial accelerators (i.e., incubators, business angels,
    seed-corn funds, and venture capital)?
    ? Is there specificity in grasping coopetitive relations between and
    among small and medium firms ?
    ? How do institutional and environmental conditions favor coopetition
    within, between, and among small and medium enterprises as well as
    large firms? And between and among foreign and domestic firms?
    ? What are the main conceptual proximities and linkages between
    coopetition and innovation?
    ? Can coopetition strategy be a source of competitiveness, value
    creation and performance? Why is it so?
    ? Are multinational corporations in a more favorable position than
    local firms to innovate while adopting a coopetition strategy?
    ? Compared with developed economies, does the nature of coopetition
    strategy change in some way when applied to transforming economies?


    References
    Ansari S., Garud R. and Kumaraswamy A. (2016). The disruptor?s
    dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management
    Journal, DOI: 10.1002/smj.24425; published online; forthcoming in print.

    Bengtsson M., and Kock S. (2014). Coopetition?Quo vadis? Past
    accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing
    Management, 43(2): 180-188.

    Brandenburger A.M., and Nalebuff B.J. (1996). Co-opetition.
    HarperCollins: New York.

    Cassiman B., Di Guardo M.C., and Valentini G. (2009). Organising R&D
    projects to profit from innovation: Insights from co-opetition. Long
    Range Planning, 42(2), 216-233.

    Chen, M-J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the Competition-Cooperation
    Relationship: A Transparadox Perspective. Journal of Management
    Inquiry, 17: 288-304

    Dagnino G.B., and Rocco E. (Eds.). (2009). Coopetition Strategy.
    Routledge: London.

    Dagnino G.B., Di Guardo M.C., and Padula G. (2012). Coopetition:
    Nature, Challenges, and Implications for Firms? Strategic Behavior and
    Managerial Mindset. In Dagnino GB. (eds.). Handbook of Research on
    Competitive Strategy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK: 492-511.

    Dosi G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological
    trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and
    directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3):147-162.

    Gnyawali D.R., and Park R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants:
    Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research
    Policy, 40(5): 650-663

    Hong J.F.L., and Snell R.S. (2015). Knowledge development through
    co-opetition: A case study of a Japanese foreign subsidiary and its
    local suppliers. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 769-780.

    Kelly P. and Kranzburg M. (1978). Technological Innovation: A Critical
    Review of Current Knowledge. San Francisco Press: San Francisco.

    Liu Y., Luo Y., Yang P. and Maksimov V. (2014). Typology and Effects
    of Co-opetition in Buyer?Supplier Relationships: Evidence from the
    Chinese Home Appliance Industry. Management and Organization Review,
    10: 439-465.

    Ritala P., and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P. (2013). Incremental and radical
    innovation in coopetition ? the role of absorptive capacity and
    appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1):
    154-169.




    ---------------------------------------
    Giovanni Battista Dagnino
    Deputy Chair and Dean of Research
    Department of Economics and Business
    University of Catania
    Corso Italia, 55
    95129 - Catania (Italy)
    Tel: 39.095.7537.622
    Fax: 39.095.7537.610
    E-mail: dagnino@unict.it
    Web site: www.giovannibattistadagnino.eu