Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  How relevant is our work?

    Posted 07-21-2008 16:30
    Does our work matter? Has your research made an impact? What about your
    teaching? Are you confident that your classes are providing your students
    with relevant, evidence-based tools for their professional careers? What
    do businesses expect of us to consider our work more relevant?

    (With apologies for cross-postings.)

    If you are willing to give some serious thought to these questions, please
    join us in “Questioning for Relevance, A Dialogue of Scholarship and
    Practice;” a PDW that will take place on Sunday, August 10 from 9:00AM to
    12:00PM at Anaheim Convention Center in the 210B room (pre-registration is
    NOT required but strongly encouraged; please email drolivaslujan@gmail.com
    to pre-register).

    We will critically reflect on the recent initiatives to bridge the
    research-practice gap, and to inspire extensions of current efforts to
    increase the relevance of academic work. Presenters have volunteered based
    on their work, recent experience and research interests. We approach the
    research-practice gap from several perspectives, including those of the
    CEO of NSHMBA (a non-profit that has recently sponsored a journal and
    increased its focus on business research), researcher, teacher, and
    practitioner perspectives. We seek to interactively explore with
    participants how each role contributes to the creation, translation, and
    dissemination of research that achieves relevance. Reports from founding
    participants in the Evidence Based Management Collaborative will be
    included. The panelists include the following:

    Lourdes Hassler, Chief Executive Officer of the National Society of
    Hispanic MBAs (NSHMBA). The organization is increasingly focusing on
    business research partly as a reaction to the dearth of research on
    Hispanics and businesses. Since 2007, the Business Journal of Hispanic
    Research has been sponsored by NSHMBA in response to this gap. Lourdes
    will share her perspective on relevant research for the business community.

    David Denyer (Cranfield U, School of Management) is also a Scholar of the
    Advanced Institute for Management (AIM); he will discuss the ways that
    evidence-informed management bridges the gap. He is an associate of the
    Research Methods Group of the Evidence Network (funded by ESRC and based
    at Queen Mary College, University of London), a multi-disciplinary
    community of senior scholars from the natural sciences (medicine) and
    social sciences to promote and investigate Evidence-based policy and
    practice in the UK. David was one of only two management scholars invited
    to attend a series of seminars funded by the health development agency
    (HDA) and delivered under the auspices of the Evidence Network Research
    Methods Group.

    Melanie P. Cohen spans the boundary of the academic and practitioner
    worlds, in her roles as the Information Technology Strategist for the U.S.
    Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and as an adjunct
    Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland (University College
    Graduate School of Management and Technology). Previously, she was the
    Chief of the Strategic Planning Unit at the U.S. Drug Enforcement
    Administration (DEA). Her experience includes organizational
    restructuring, change, and culture and her research focuses on public
    management and the 21st century organization. She will share her
    observations on the connection between theory and practice, specifically
    how theory informs practice and practice implements theory.

    Joy Beatty (U of Michigan – Dearborn) reflects on the relationship between
    our research questions and teaching. If we are looking at having direct
    impact on practice, how does teaching serve that in relation to discipline-
    based research? Are we there to translate or transmit the “real” work from
    other areas into plain English? Or are we preparing the students to
    receive new ideas by opening their minds and teaching topics like critical
    thinking? And whose needs do we serve when we form our research questions?

    Chad Smith (Clarion U of Pennsylvania) sold his manufacturing company –a
    firm in ten industries with annual sales of ten million dollars that
    employed eighty individuals within three different internal divisions and
    two distributorships in Florida and Texas. Chad has been in the
    manufacturing industry for the past fourteen years and owned his business
    throughout the latter twelve years. Simultaneously, he earned his
    Doctorate of Science in Information Systems and Communications and entered
    academia as a member of the Business Faculty at Clarion’s College of
    Business Administration. His presentation will highlight differences that
    these worlds present.

    Josetta Mclaughlin (Roosevelt U) addresses the problem of translating
    research, based on her work with journalists. She has studied how psycho-
    metricians are presenting the data associated with standardized testing
    and the problems the journalists face in interpreting the numbers. Her
    perspective about these professionals will encourage the audience to ask
    the questions that make their work more translatable for non-specialists.

    Miguel R Olivas-Luján (Clarion U of Pennsylvania and Tecnológico de
    Monterrey –Mexico) is Liaison to Practice for the MED division in 2007-08
    and organizer of this session. He represents MED in the Evidence-Based
    Management Collaborative (EBMC) convened by Denise Rousseau since 2007.
    Miguel’s contribution is twofold: report on the progress of the EBMC and
    make a presentation on “Holographic writing,” a writing style suitable for
    reporting research to non-technical audiences in layers of gradual and
    increasing complexity.

    After a first set of presentations, a 45-min discussion period has been
    scheduled to allow exercises facilitated by the presenters to engage the
    audience through discussions in round tables. The second set of
    presentations is scheduled to think about concrete ways in which our
    research can be made more accessible and relevant to practitioners.

    This Professional Development Workshop was organized on behalf of the MED
    division and is sponsored by PTC, OB, TIM, MOC, PNP, MEN, and CM.

    For more information and to pre-register, contact Miguel R. Olivas-Luján
    (drolivaslujan@gmail.com).


  • 2.  How relevant is our work?

    Posted 09-11-2008 18:38

    Hello fellow MED, IMD, and GDO division members!

     

    This is to share information on the PDW that the MED Practice Liaison Committee held in Anaheim, entitled "Questioning for Relevance, a Dialogue of Scholarship and Practice."  As the former Practice Liaison for the division, I venture to say that all attendants learned and shared something helpful and am grateful to the awesome panel of presenters that volunteered their time and intellectual contributions.  I have created the page to respond to various requests from fellow AoM members and to create an online archive that may be useful in the future.

     

    On the webpage you will find:

    •     the PDW proposal as submitted in November 2007

    •     MP3 files with the actual presentations and discussions

    •     slides and handouts used by the presenters

    •     useful additional and related materials

     

    The address is:  http://www.drolivas.org/questioningforrelevance

     

    Hope you find this helpful!

     

    Miguel

    ____________________________________________________________

    * Academically interested in Successful Women? http://www.drolivas.org/successfulprofessionalwomenoftheamericas

    Miguel R. Olivas-Lujan, Ph.D.

    Professor of Management

    Clarion U. of Pennsylvania / Tec de Monterrey

    840 Wood St

    Clarion, PA 16214

    Tel: +1 (814) 393.2641

    Fax: +1 (814) 393.1910

    E-mail: molivas@clarion.edu

    WWW: http://www.drolivas.org 

    Member of Mexico's National Researchers System